Apparently the missiles being smuggled into Yemen had a different final destination (did you guess Iraq?).
I've always wondered, if the Yemeni missiles were intended for "self defence" and legally obtained, why did they have to be smuggled into the country on board a North Korean freighter?
Wait a minute, North Korea and Iraq doing something evil? Surely it can't be so. I mean, President Bush was just being a hokey redneck cowboy when he made his axis of evil speech, there couldn't possibly be truth to the charges, right?
And how about this little report, alleging that North Korea is going to kick out all UN nuclear inspectors.
Some of these people with a "condone anything as long as it is anti-American" mentality are in for a real shock when an attack happens on US soil that makes 9/11 look like a minor traffic accident.
Posted by Neal (Nukevet) at December 27, 2002 09:17 AMAll I can say is that we had *better* have put the whammy on those Scuds when we brought that E.O.D. team on board to "stabilize" the missiles.
Posted by: J. Austin Wilde on December 28, 2002 02:18 AMScuds being liquid fueled means complicated engines with lots of valves and places for "Gremlins" to cause problems. I would be very, very surprised if any of the scuds that were "stablized" wouln't explode at launch. Just can't trust N. Korean technology, now can you. The scud is nothing more than an update on the old German V2 rocket, and they failed all the time. Shouldn't be tough to help nature along with this.
Posted by: puggs on December 28, 2002 11:58 AMwhoya gonna call? Scudbusters!
Posted by: Madman on December 29, 2002 11:55 AMI just can't take anythng Bush says seriously until he akcnowledges Saudi Arabia as a terrorist-friendly regime.
Posted by: Sylvain on December 29, 2002 09:12 PM