I'm filing things like this under 'words said in anger'.

They're angry that they didn't get a US bodycount for the knocking out of two so high up the chain of command. So they're hinting that maybe next time, we should.

I don't know why the GI's even speak to reporters other than to say "Hi Mom".

OH FUCK THAT!

Like we want to see these pukes manipulate an international kangaroo kourt blabbing about a bunch of BS 5 fucking years from now like Milosevic or Mussaoui.

they left enough of the heads for ID, they did an excellent job

shoot first, laugh about it later

That's no joke. Any intel we could've dragged out of these guys, wouldn't likely be worth allowing them to live for even another second. Fuck 'em all. The End.

It isn't a friggin duel, because they were four we should have used fewer men? How many to make Newsweek and it's prissy prima donna SAS friends happy? I've never know a British source in spec ops to NOT talk down on the US Army, they always tell the press they could've done it better, faster, cleaner. It's also bullshit, they aren't better, they're just stuck on themselves.

As for Newsweek, if they had sent 20 men in quietly, then met resistence from some of the 1000 villagers who later mourned these two fucksticks............Well you can see the headlines now, Army Blows Chance To Kill Them.....Not enough men for the job, what were they thinking, yadda fucking yadda......

In the eyes of the press we can never fucking do it right. Fine, give pencil dick a rifle and send in his ass next time. Oh and tell him he gets no vehicle or air support, wouldn't want any OVERKILL,.........What's the matter magazine man, you ain't turned pussy all of a sudden?

Have you?