Gun culture stymies the UN in Kosovo
I wouldn't call what they have a 'Gun Culture'. I'd call it 'Citizens who recently suffered through an ethnic cleansing, arming themselves so that it may not happen again'.
Of course the UN hates that someone may cover their own ass and not need their interference.
And armed populace that is willing to protect itself from harm. Sound like any other country that the UN doesn't currently like that you know of? (For tips in answering this question, see the post below)
Found at Curmudgeonly and Skeptical
Posted by AnalogKid at September 29, 2003 02:30 AM | TrackBackJust like the USA is banning guns in Iraq?
perhaps the NRA should get on the cas?
Posted by: / on September 29, 2003 11:03 AMAs usual, you open your pie-hole and show that you're still and ignorant fuck. Disarming Ba'athist loyalists isn't disarming the rest of Iraq.
But in your world, everythings the same right? Pissant.
Posted by: Raging Dave on September 29, 2003 12:01 PMActualy in some areas, the US has been allowing one ak-47 per household for defense. It's a matter of home protection, and knowing who can be trusted. Just not in the Sunni Triangle.
Posted by: Mark (puggs) on September 29, 2003 01:41 PMI always thought one of the points of the right to bear arms was to fight oppression either from your domestic government or foreign invaders.
Looks to me like the people of the Sunni Triangle are exercising their rights.
Posted by: / on September 29, 2003 02:44 PMOnce again, the idiotic fucktard now known as "/" shows that yes, he is as fucking stupid as we think.
Show me where the Iraqis are covered by the US Bill of Rights, you stupid shit. Or shut the fuck up. Don't try to sidetrack the argument, because you just show yourself to be a fucking waste of oxygen. Either come up with a cognative point and stick with it, or go fuck yourself.
Posted by: Raging Dave on September 29, 2003 06:40 PMSo universal rights only apply to Americans now?
You are funny!
Posted by: / on September 30, 2003 06:39 AMSince when is the Bill of Rights universal, you fucking retard? It's AMERICAN. How can you be so fucking stupid? Really, what does it take to approach ignorance of your level? If ignorance is truly bliss, you're walking around having orgasms from breathing, because you make statements here that can only be ascribed to a fucking brain-dead moron. The show of idiocy from you is breathtaking in it's magnitude, truly. If you didn't have an autonomous brain-stem you'd be too fucking stupid to remember how to breath.
Posted by: Raging Dave on September 30, 2003 09:36 AMOh I see, when you promised to "liberate" Iraq that didnt mean them getting a bill of rights?
Posted by: / on October 1, 2003 05:36 AM*sigh*
It's not "a bill of rights" but "THE bill of rights". There is a huge difference. Wouldn't forcing our bill of rights on them be rather, you know, imperialistic?
We have helped them start their bill of rights -
1) You have the right not to be raped by Uday and Qusay
2) You have the right not to be fed feet first into a paper shredder
3) You have the right not to be mustard gassed because you are Kurdish
...The rest is up to them.
As usual, you ignore the fact that the Iraqis really are liberated to make some snarky, bilious comment.
Posted by: \ on October 1, 2003 09:13 AM