Gee... but according to Ms. "/" the Werwolf didn't kill anyone at all!

Those who don't know their history, seem to be the first to scream quagmire. Hitlers Germany had 13 years to indoctrinate the youth, it's only surprising that we pacified Germany as quickly as we did.

Saddam had over twenty years to forment this kind of fanatical loyalty. Not counting the others who were radicalized by the result of his actions. In two years let's see what happens. The attacks are switching from assualts by troops to remote controled bombing. That suggests they are rather short on men willing to expose themselves to combat. It also suggests their rate of attrition has been higher than they can tolerate easily.

The situation in Iraq is no where near as bad as some suggest. It's continueing to improve, despite "/" drooling hopes to the contrary.

Notice the strong rebuttal to the argument as well. Make shit up, get called on it, and then run away to hide. Pretty pathetic, actually..........

All is well in Iraq then?

Another three of your guys got it today, I wonder if their families would agree with your optimism?

"/," you stupid fucktard, keep your threads in order. This thread is about post-WW2 Germany, and the deaths YOU claimed that the Werwolf never caused. But OK, we'll talk a little about Iraq. Yes, there are still dangerous individuals in Iraq. That is not in doubt. What we have stated, if you'd actually read the arguments rather than contstruct straw men, is that the fact that there's still resistance to the liberation among hard-liners is unsurprising given the amount of time that Saddam had to indoctrinate his fanatics (over a decade longer than Hitler had) We have repeatedly made the point that this fact does not mean that idiots like you can factually claim that the invasion was a total failure. In fact, by any sane standard of military history it was one of the most successful invasions of any place, ever.

HAhahaha! ANother complete non-sequiter.

I don't think that anyone here ever argued about Iraq not being dangerous. What we argued about was your assertation that there were exactly 0 deaths caused by the werwolf SS. A fact that has been repudiated beyond any doubt. So, you ignore the fact that your ass has been handed to you (again) and head down a completely different path - one that no one here ever asserted.

I said, and I quote

"no deaths from the werwolves post 1945"

Still awaiting the evidence that this is wrong my most faithful fan.

(or do you think just stating you have evidence cuts the ice)

Tell you what, send it here

whogivesaflyingf*ckwhathehasmadeup@yahoo.co.uk